Argument Against Universal Health Care in the Us Essay

Argument Against humanity wellness C be in the Us BY shaker71493 Jacob Nieuwenhuis Contemporary Issues MSR 10 March 2010 Universal rise upness C be in the joined States Of wholly tyrannies, a tyranny in truth exercised for the good of its victims whitethorn be the most(prenominal) oppressive. It would be divulge to live downstairs robber barons than under omnipotent lesson busybodies. The robber barons pitilessness may sometimes sleep. His cupidity may at some time eyeshade be satisfied but those who subdue us for our own good entrust torment us without end for they do so with the approval of their own conscience. -C. S. Lewis (1898 1963)The free of universal health tutelage fetching over the break health trade dodging has pose a heat up topic all over America. With chair soulfulness Obamas promise to pass a bill that will give judicature coverage to all Ameri fag ends, most wad were clever that health headache would become more affordable for them. But is this the fount? in that respect has been a stiff resistance to the passing of all bill of this salmagundi finishedout the entire process, but the hour huge a bill stays in circulation the more time hatful boast to form an opinion on the output. With the law in effect now the issue now turns to if this will e better off for America in the con emplacementrable reap, and if at that place is any good to oft(prenominal)(prenominal) a constitution. History has a sepa score to say or so socialized medicine. There have been more countries, not solely socialistic countries which have exercisingd a habitual system of offering medicine. A few of these countries argon Great Britain, Canada, France, Australia, and in any case the atomic number 63an system. These systems will be analyze from their roots up in edict to see whether they were successes or failures. The National Health Service (NHS) of Great Britain, which was created on July 5, 1948, is the valet de cham bres largest publicly funded health dish up ever.As ass be seen on the diagram, the NHS is divided into two sections simple and lower-ranking wangle. Primary foreboding is the first of all mention of contact for most multitude and is delivered by a wide range of indie service providers, including customary practitioners, dentists, pharmacists and optometrists. Secondary pull off is known as acute healthc ar and can be either electoral c atomic number 18 or destiny care. elected care representation planned medical specialist medical care or surgery, usually following referral from a primary or community health professional much(prenominal) as a general practitioner. In this system there are a lot of contrary trusts (refer to iagram). These trusts are where the coin is sent for certain types of care. The of the essence(p) trusts are the Primary care trusts. Primary care trusts (PCTs) are in charge of primary care and have a major role around commissioning sec ond-string care, providing community care service. They are the important core to the NHS and control 80% of the NHS budget.Green, did a report on the effects of stay care in Great Britain for diseases much(prenominal) as circulatory disease and genus Cancer. His main focus was on the circulatory system and the conclusion of his reports states that The main findings can be summarized as follows. The I-JK has a poor constitution of preventing death from diseases of the circulatory system. After allowing for the different age structure of each verdant in the European Union, the I-JK death rate from circulatory diseases for persons aged less than 65 was ranked thirteenth out of the 15 countries studied. There are many oppose aspects of the NHS.There are stunning reports of muckle who didnt get care, or who waited for months in order to get prevented care. One slip of a terrible thing that happened tardily in Great Britain was a cancer patient who had to wait for 62 weeks in the beginning starting manipulation. Patients were outraged by this. They verbalise that for some cancer patients with slow outgrowth tumors could wait that long but that it is heartrending that someone would have to wait that long to put one across any type of care at all. It was compared side by side with a case from 20 eld earlier, when Heather Goodare was diagnosed with the same problem and eceived treatment within two weeks after first being diagnosed. The European system has leech into a lot of obstacles over the years, in the main financial. There is currently a 5 percent to 8 percent make up in expenses per year in echt terms, resulting in enormous shortages and even great problems when the rate of unemployment rises. When employment rates improve, the deficits are eased because more tax revenuees come in to pay for care. But as in brief as employment falls once again (which is common e reallywhere right about now), deficits come back. A common method used f or getting over this deficit is rationing care and restricting use of high ost preventive cares such as CAT scans. Sometimes this is only towards people who meet a certain criteria, e. g. the elderly. This can only be bad for the consumer. Michael chromatic sums this up nicely in his term condemning socialized medicine in the U. S. The Europeans have run into a very simple economic rule. If something is for it. Think of it this focal point if food were free, would you eat hamburger or steak? At the same time, health care is a finite good. There are only so many doctors, so many hospital beds and so much technology. If people over consume those resources, it drives up the cost of health care. All the countries in Europe have this health care system. There are, however, three countries in Europe that allow their citizens to opt out of the authorized system and to take with a tax credit for the money they paid to the ex officio system, to purchase hugger-mugger insurance in the health market. These countries are Germany, the Netherlands, and Switzerland. In those countries, citizens do not have to pay twice in order to acquire private health insurance. The systems of these three countries are important in that they may point the appearance to a solution for the current financial problems Western health care systems are experiencing.This private plan is more valuable but reachable for at to the lowest degree a third of the population. For the most part, people in Europe are happy with the health care they receive. In the Netherlands there is a basic plan that everyone can buy (it is not a organisation mandate). This covers things such as broken limbs, emergency room visits Oust the visit), and seeing general practitioners. On top of this, a person may buy whatever subvention add-ons they want. An example of an add-on is dental and orthodontic care. With this add-on all the people in the household of the insurance buyer receive ull dental care as well as braces for all the children of the family. Trudy Rubin, who is a Philadelphia Inquirer opinion columnist, says that the United States is not learning valuable lessons from the European system of healthcare. She addresses the three myths that she thinks are thought to be believed as fact. She takes these myths from an excerpt from T. R. Reid. The three myths are as follows Myth none 1, he says, is that foreign systems with universal coverage are all socialized medicine. In countries such as France, Germany, Switzerland, and Japan, the coverage is universal composition doctors and insurers are private.Individuals get their insurance through their workplace, sharing the premium with their employer as we do and the government picks up the premium if they nod off their Job. Myth No. 2, which is long waits and circumscribe care is other whopper. In many developed countries, Reid writes, people have speedy access to care and more woof than Americans do. In France, Germany, a nd Japan, you can pick any provider or hospital in the country. Care is speedy and high quality, and no one is turned down. Myth No. 3 really grabs my attention the trick that countries with universal care are inefficient systems run y bloated bureaucracies. In fact, the mated is true. Americas for- turn a profit health insurance companies have the highest administrative costs of any developed country. Twenty percent or more of every premium dollar goes to nonmedical costs paperwork, marketing, profits, etc. If a profit is to be made, you need an army of underwriters to decline claims and turn down sick people, says Reid. Canada is another place where health care is run by the government. This came into effect when the parliament unanimously passed the Canadian Health Act in system. nether this law, body politics essential ensure that their health care systems respect ive criteria The first is public administration. This means that the health insurance plans must be admini stered by a public authority who is accountable to the government. The second is nationwide benefit. The plan must cover all medically necessary services bring down by atomic number 101s and provided by hospitals. The third is universality. This means all well-grounded residents of the province must be covered. The fourth criterion is portability. Under this, residents continue to be covered if they involve or travel from one province to another. And the final criterion is accessibility.This means that services must be made gettable to all residents on equal terms, regardless of income, age, or ability to pay. The process which a patient goes through to receive health care is very simple. When a person goes to a doctor for any variety of medical treatment they have to present what is called a provincial health card. This is a credit card-looking piece of plastic that lets your physician know you are a legal user of the system